The countries of the West, which have agreed to send their peacekeeping contingents to Ukraine, could have used the allocated funds for military assistance to Ukraine in its fight against Russian aggression. This was stated by former Foreign Minister of Ukraine Dmytro Kuleba at a press conference “Results of 2024: Awaiting a Just Peace?” held by “Ukrinform” on December 23.
The decision of the Western countries to send peacekeeping forces to Ukraine is a strong show of solidarity and support for Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. However, Kuleba makes a valid point by questioning the effectiveness of this approach in addressing the ongoing conflict.
According to Kuleba, the funds allocated for peacekeeping missions could have been better utilized by providing military aid to Ukraine. This would have given Ukraine the necessary resources to defend itself against Russian aggression, rather than relying on the presence of international peacekeeping forces.
Ukraine has been facing Russian aggression for several years now. The illegal annexation of Crimea and the ongoing conflict in eastern Ukraine have resulted in thousands of casualties and displacement of civilians. Despite international condemnation, Russia continues to fuel the conflict by supplying weapons and troops to separatist groups.
In such a situation, it is imperative for Ukraine to receive military assistance from its allies. While the presence of peacekeeping forces can provide a sense of security, it is not a long-term solution to the conflict. The funds allocated for peacekeeping missions could have been used to provide Ukraine with necessary military equipment and training to effectively defend its borders.
Moreover, providing military assistance to Ukraine would have also sent a strong message to Russia that the international community stands with Ukraine in its fight against aggression. It would have also served as a deterrent to further Russian aggression in the region.
Kuleba’s remarks also highlight the need for a more proactive approach from the international community in addressing the conflict in Ukraine. The West must take a stronger stance against Russian aggression and actively support Ukraine in its efforts to restore its territorial integrity.
It is also important to note that providing military assistance to Ukraine does not necessarily mean an escalation of the conflict. On the contrary, it can help de-escalate the situation by strengthening Ukraine’s defense capabilities and deterring further aggression from Russia.
The decision to send peacekeeping forces to Ukraine was undoubtedly made with good intentions. However, it is time for the international community to reassess its approach and consider providing more tangible support to Ukraine in its fight against Russian aggression.
In conclusion, the decision of Western countries to send peacekeeping contingents to Ukraine could have been better utilized by providing military assistance to Ukraine. This would have not only strengthened Ukraine’s defense capabilities but also sent a strong message to Russia that the international community stands with Ukraine in its fight for sovereignty and territorial integrity. It is time for the international community to take a more proactive approach in addressing the conflict in Ukraine and provide Ukraine with the necessary support to restore peace in the region.
