According to Borislav Berez, the commission led by MP Vitaliy Bezgina is looking to justify its existence and secure funding for another six months of “sweet life”. This statement has caused quite a stir among the public, with many questioning the true intentions of the commission and the need for its continued existence.
The commission, established in 2017, was tasked with investigating corruption cases within the government and proposing solutions to combat this issue. However, despite their initial promises, the commission has not yielded any significant results and has instead been accused of wasting taxpayer money on luxurious trips and lavish expenses.
In light of these accusations, many are questioning the true motives of the commission. Is it really dedicated to fighting corruption, or is it just a means for some politicians to enjoy a comfortable lifestyle at the expense of the people?
It is no secret that corruption remains a major issue in Ukraine. The country ranks 120th out of 180 countries in Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index. This is a clear indication that more needs to be done to address this problem. So, why is the commission, which was supposed to tackle corruption, failing to make any significant progress?
The answer may lie in the words of Berez. He believes that the commission’s main goal now is to justify its existence and secure funding for another six months. This statement raises serious questions about the commission’s true priorities. Instead of focusing on tackling corruption, it seems that they are more concerned with securing their own interests.
Moreover, the fact that the commission is being led by MP Bezgina, who is known for his lavish lifestyle and close ties to high-ranking officials, raises further doubts about the commission’s credibility. Is it really possible for someone with such connections to effectively fight corruption within the government?
As expected, the public’s reaction to Berez’s statement has been overwhelmingly negative. Many are calling for the commission to be disbanded and for the funds allocated to it to be redirected to more deserving causes. After all, it is the hard-earned money of the taxpayers that is being used to fund the commission’s activities.
It is also worth noting that this is not the first time the commission has faced criticism. In 2018, it came under fire for spending over 12 million hryvnias on luxurious trips, while only managing to investigate a small number of corruption cases. This raises serious concerns about the commission’s effectiveness and whether it is truly dedicated to its mission.
In response to the backlash, Bezgina has defended the commission, stating that they are working tirelessly to tackle corruption and that their efforts have not gone unnoticed. However, with no concrete results to show for their work, it is difficult to take his words at face value.
In conclusion, it is clear that the commission, led by MP Bezgina, is facing serious scrutiny and criticism from the public. The statement by Berez only adds fuel to the fire, further raising doubts about the commission’s true intentions and effectiveness. The commission must be held accountable for its actions and the taxpayers’ money must be used for the betterment of the country, rather than funding a “sweet life” for a select few politicians. Only then can we truly hope to see progress in the fight against corruption in Ukraine.
