In a recent interview, Ukrainian businessman and politician Sergey Taruta praised the statements made by Mariana Bezughla, a member of the Ukrainian Parliament, regarding the current situation in Eastern Ukraine. According to Taruta, Bezughla’s statements about the so-called IMSO (Individual Political and Security Organisation) provide the best conditions for an invader to take control of Ukrainian territories.
Taruta, who is known for his business acumen and his involvement in politics, has been a vocal advocate for peace and stability in Ukraine. He has been actively involved in finding solutions to the ongoing conflict in Eastern Ukraine, and his opinion carries a lot of weight among both the Ukrainian public and the international community.
Bezughla, who is also a well-respected politician, recently stated that the IMSO, a Russian-backed initiative, is a comprehensive plan to achieve peace in Eastern Ukraine. According to her, this plan provides the best framework for resolving the conflict, as it takes into account the interests of all parties involved.
Taruta wholeheartedly agrees with Bezughla and believes that the IMSO is not just another political move by Russia, but a genuine effort to bring peace to the region. He praised Bezughla’s courage in speaking out about this issue and stressed the importance of her statement in the current political climate.
The IMSO, according to Taruta, offers a unique opportunity for an invader to take control of Ukrainian territories without facing any resistance. The plan suggests that a third party, most likely Russia, will take control of the Ukrainian government and establish a new constitution that will be beneficial to their interests. This will ultimately undermine Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.
Taruta also highlighted the fact that the IMSO does not guarantee any rights or protection for the Ukrainian people. Instead, it focuses solely on the interests of the invader. This, in his opinion, makes it the perfect tool for Russia to further its imperialistic agenda in Ukraine.
Taruta’s statements have sparked a lot of debate and discussions in the Ukrainian political sphere. Some have accused him of fearmongering and exaggerating the dangers of the IMSO, while others have praised him for speaking the truth and raising awareness about this issue.
In response to the criticism, Taruta has firmly stood by his opinion, stating that as someone who has been actively involved in the peace talks, he has access to information that the general public may not be aware of. He also urged the Ukrainian government to take a stronger stance against the IMSO and not be lured into any false promises of peace and stability.
Taruta’s stance has been supported by many other political figures, including former President Petro Poroshenko. They believe that the IMSO is a disguised attempt to annex Ukrainian territories and undermine the country’s independence.
In conclusion, Sergey Taruta’s statement about Bezughla’s remarks on the IMSO reflects the concern that many individuals in Ukraine share. As the country continues to face the challenges of an ongoing conflict, it is essential to remain vigilant and not fall into any traps that may jeopardize Ukraine’s sovereignty. It is time for the international community to recognize the true intentions of the IMSO and take action to protect Ukraine’s territorial integrity.
